legal web Ltd
Fürbergstrasse 42a
5020 Salzburg
Austria
company register
FN 522761t
Salzburg Regional Court
Business
Services in automatic data processing and information technology
Chamber of Commerce
UBIT Salzburg specialist group, Salzburg Chamber of Commerce
supervisory authority
Magistrate of Salzburg
UID number
ATU74977313
Contact
T +43 662 234150
M [email protected]
Do you have any questions regarding the purchase of our products?
You can get answers to questions about our products via our support portal .
Do you have questions regarding installation, configuration or errors?
Visit wordpress.org for support for WP GDPR free users.
Support for users of the premium version of WP GDPR is available via our support portal .
Do you need support with the technical implementation?
You can get offers from the implementation of our services to the legally compliant implementation of entire websites and web shops via our support portal .
Do you have individual legal questions?
As a software manufacturer, we are not allowed to offer individual legal advice.
For individual legal questions regarding German and Austrian websites, we recommend ( § ) MARKETINGRECHT.EU – with a free initial consultation and legal advice via video conference . Lawyer Peter Harlander is involved in legalweb.io and is therefore not only an expert in data protection law, e-commerce law and e-marketing law, but also knows our product in detail.
Would you like to conduct an interview or talk about possible cooperation?
In these cases you can reach us directly via email [email protected] and telephone +43 662 234150 .
If you want to change your privacy settings (grant consent or revoke your previously granted consent), you can change your settings.
Purpose: Failure analysis, statistical analysis of our website
rocessing operations: Collection of connection data, of data of your web browser and data of accessed content; execution of analysis software and storing of data on your terminal device, anonymization of collected data; analysis of anonymous data in the form of statistics
Storage period: Data on your device for up to two years.
Joint controller: Google LLC, Amphitheatre Parkway, Mountain View, CA 94043, USA
Legal basis of processing: voluntary, revocable consent at any time
Consequences of not consenting: No immediate impact on the website’s function, but limited possibilities of further development and failure analysis
Legal basis of data transfer to the US: Data will be transmitted to the United States on the basis of your consent according to Art. 49 (1) (a) in conjunction with Art. 6 (1) (a) GDPR. The United States have not adopted data protection standards in conformity with EU requirements. In particular US intelligence agencies will be able to access your data without informing you hand without you and without you being able to take legal action. For this reason, the European Court of Justice has issued a judgment by which it invalidated the previous adequacy decision.
Purpose: Video playback
rocessing operations: Collection of connection data, of data of your web browser and data of accessed content; placing of advertising cookies by Google; processing of collected data by Google
Storage period: until you leave the website
Joint controller: Google Ireland Limited, Gordon House, Barrow Street, Dublin 4, Ireland
Legal basis of processing: voluntary, revocable consent at any time
Consequences of not consenting: The YouTube service will not be made available.
Legal basis for the transmission of data to the USA:The Google group will transmit your personal data to the United States. Data will be transmitted to the United States on the basis of your consent according to Art. 49 (1) (a) in conjunction with Art. 6 (1) (a) GDPR. The United States have not adopted data protection standards in conformity with EU requirements. In particular US intelligence agencies will be able to access your data without informing you hand without you and without you being able to take legal action. For this reason, the European Court of Justice has issued a judgment by which it invalidated the previous adequacy decision.